您的一票代表什么
如果不获通过
为何现在出现在选票上
资金
由谁承担费用
谁在背后
支持来自哪里
根据背书者和出资者来定位，而非根据我们的意见。 我们如何定位提案
加州共和党和纳税人团体Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association建议对第43号提案投赞成票，加州民主党则建议投反对票。倡议团体GrowSF和商业团体San Francisco Chamber of Commerce也支持此提案，而劳工组织California Teachers Association和倡导良好施政的团体League of Women Voters of California则反对。支持第43号提案的委员会的最大捐款者是California Business Roundtable Issues PAC。反对此提案的委员会的最大捐款者是SEIU California State Council For Working People。 91086712111314
背书
追踪资金
赞成主要捐款者
一名捐款者捐出此方一半以上的资金。
- California Business Roundtable Issues PACUS$1069万
这是谁？
- Protect Prop. 13, a project of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers AssociationUS$151.3万
- Douglas Emmett Properties, LP and affiliated entitiesUS$100万
这是谁？
Douglas Emmett是一家房地产公司。其投资者演示文稿说，它在洛杉矶和檀香山拥有办公大楼和14处公寓物业。 1
- Kilroy Realty, LPUS$100万
这是谁？
- 1800 Capital, Inc. (Formerly - Ace Beverage Group, Inc.)US$50万
这是谁？
- Right Path California Issues PAC, sponsored by taxpayer and business advocatesUS$40万
- Jerry A. GreenbergUS$25万
- Andrew SchwartzbergUS$10万
- McCourt Partners Real Estate, LLC(Frank McCourt)US$10万
这是谁？
- Moss Management Services, Inc.US$8.5万
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的90%。
- 1%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$18万
委员会: Yes on Prop 43 - The Local Taxpayer Protection Act, Sponsored by Homeowners, Businesses, and Taxpayers; Yes on Prop. 43, a Project of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
反对主要捐款者
- SEIU California State Council For Working PeopleUS$150.4万
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic OrganizationsUS$105.4万
这是谁？
名为“No on 39”的委员会。其名称表示，它由护士、教师，以及非营利劳工和诊所团体赞助。 1
- Service Employees International Union - SEIU Local 2015 Issues PACUS$100万
- California Professional Firefighters Ballot Issues CommitteeUS$84.6万
这是谁？
捐款者的说法
California Professional Firefighters 的会长在第43号提案的反对论据上签名。该论据说，第43号提案“想让地方选民更难将新的资金用于警察和消防等服务”。 3
- Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor OrganizationsUS$59.9万
- California Community FoundationUS$58.5万
这是谁？
洛杉矶的慈善团体。它说，它通过捐赠和公民事务工作，努力强化洛杉矶郡的社区。 1
- Service Employees International Union Local 1021 Issues PACUS$50万
这是谁？
SEIU Local 1021 的网站说，它代表超过60,000名工人。他们在北加州的地方政府、非营利组织、医疗保健机构和学校工作。 1
- Service Employees International Union Local 721 CTW, CLC Issues & Initiatives sponsored by service employee unionsUS$50万
- Western States Regional Council of Carpenters Issues CommitteeUS$50万
这是谁？
Western States Regional Council of Carpenters的一个委员会。该理事会的网站说，它代表南加州及其他九个西部州的会员。 1
- Southern California Partnership For Jobs (Nonprofit 501 (C)(6))US$50万
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的44%。
- 1%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$7.8万
委员会: Black Californians for Thriving Communities-Yes on Prop 3, No on Props 39 & 43, Sponsored by California Black Power Network Action Fund; Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund; Long Beach Against Proposition 43; No on Prop 43: Stop the Local Taxpayer Deception Act, Sponsored by Labor Organizations; Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $180,310, mostly by: Reform California with Carl DeMaio - Ballot Measure Committee $148,862; Make California Golden: Senator Strickland's Ballot Measure Committee $14,000; Grove's Ballot Measure Committee For A Safer And Smarter California; Senator $10,500. Separate from total_raised.
- Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund (FPPC 1496598) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $2,230,062 of its $2,412,491 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (92%).
- No on Prop 43: Stop the Local Taxpayer Deception Act, Sponsored by Labor Organizations: added $1,059,000 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- NO side: $168,634 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $77,603, mostly by: Faith Votes, Sponsored by PICO California Action Fund $38,721; ACLU California Action Issues Committee $8,989; Million Voter Project Action Fund, Sponsored by Social Justice Organizations $5,299. Separate from total_raised.
- Committee totals are the Secretary of State's per-measure 'Total Reported Contributions' through 2026-10-22 (secretary of state page), plus later 24-hour reports from the Cal-Access bulk export built 2026-10-28. Donors, geography and independent expenditures come from the itemized Cal-Access filings. Contributions to committees that back several measures are credited pro rata to the share the Secretary of State assigns to this measure.
- Source cutoff: the Cal-Access export used was built 2026-10-27 (UTC) and the Secretary of State's per-measure totals run through 2026-10-22. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Money given to a committee by another committee is shown as that committee, not the money's original source (e.g. a union's issues PAC, not its members). Donor type is inferred from the name; check the filing for sponsors.
资料来源: CA Secretary of State: Proposition 43 contribution totals · Cal-Access raw campaign finance data export · FPPC Top 10 Contributors, November 2026 General Election
支持与反对的最有力论点
双方各自最有力的论点，按其支持者的说法撰写。两者都不代表我们的观点。
支持的最有力论点
支持者包括加州纳税人协会、加州家族企业协会（Family Business Association of California）和加州西班牙裔商会（California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce）。他们说，加州家庭面临全国最高的所得税、销售税和汽油税。支持者认为，法院判决在第13号提案中制造了漏洞，让特殊利益团体得以通过大幅加税。他们说，地方政府在过去十年中已实施超过2,000项新税或加税。支持者认为，这些税提高了食品、汽油、水电费和住房的成本。他们说，有些城市征收的房地产转让税高达6%。支持者认为，第43号提案恢复了地方特别税的三分之二票数要求。支持者也说，它要求政府将税款用于选民批准的特定目的。 14
反对的最有力论点
反对者包括加州专业消防员协会（California Professional Firefighters）、加州教师联合会（California Federation of Teachers）和Nurse Alliance of SEIU California。反对者说，第43号提案不会为任何人减税。反对者认为，它让仅33.4%的选民就能阻止将近67%选民想要的事，因此一张反对票的分量是一张赞成票的两倍。他们说，在华盛顿削减医疗资金之际，它会使消防站、911应急、野火安全、道路维修、学校和地方医疗保健更难获得资金。反对者认为，它会让一小部分少数人阻止地方建造可负担住房的努力。他们说，在选举中大举花钱的企业捐款者将获益最多。反对者认为，目前当地方选民决定如何为其社区提供资金时，是由多数决定，而第43号提案剥夺了这一点。 14
资料来源
本页每项事实都连结至以下其中一个来源。
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 43 (en edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3, 10
- Proposition 43: Official Title and Summary (prepared by the Attorney General), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-2
- Proposition 43: Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 2
- Proposition 43: Arguments and rebuttals, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3-4
- Proposition 43: Text of Proposed Law, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1
- GrowSF: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- San Francisco Chamber of Commerce: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Democratic Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Republican Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Teachers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop 43: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-27 (compiled by this guide from CA Secretary of State: Proposition 43 contribution totals; data/money/ca-2026-11-p43.json, main@0dcbec8)