跳至主要内容

由人工智能生成并经自动核查我们如何核查

报告错误

位置:本页

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

运作方式

旧金山及加州 Ballot Backstory以七种语言说明每项提案的历史、资金和支持者。以下说明这些页面如何制作和核查。

我们发布什么

报告错误

位置:我们发布什么

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

每项提案一页:投赞成票和反对票的作用、提案为何现在出现在选票上、涉及的资金、由谁列入选票、谁背书、双方各由谁出资,以及支持和反对的最有力论点。其中七项提案还附有过去决策的时间线,以及过往提案承诺与成果的记录。

每一页如何撰写

报告错误

位置:每一页如何撰写

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

我们从原始资料出发:官方选民指南、审计长和立法分析师的财务分析、法律条文、竞选财务申报以及已发布的背书。人工智能模型只根据这些资料起草每一页,每一句都附有支持该句的来源连结。

自动核查

报告错误

位置:自动核查

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

页面上线前没有任何人审阅或编辑。每个页面都必须通过以下自动核查。最后一栏显示有多少已发布页面通过了每项核查。

核查结果
引用:由第二个模型确认每段引文都支持其所属的句子。175 个页面通过
数字:由程序将每个数字与来源数据比对。175 个页面通过
引文:由程序确认每段引文都逐字出现在已保存的来源中。175 个页面通过
交叉核查:由另一家公司的人工智能模型重新核查各项陈述。175 个页面略过
中立性:由模型以进步派、温和派和保守派读者的角度阅读,按中立准则为每份草稿评分。改写后仍不合格的页面只显示官方文本。175 个页面通过
浅白语言:由模型检查每个页面是否容易阅读。175 个页面通过
翻译:由两个模型各自翻译,两者意思不一致的部分会重新翻译。—
回译:由另一个模型把译文翻回英文,以找出意思上的改变。150 个页面通过 · 25 个页面不适用
词汇表:选举用语必须与旧金山和加州的官方翻译一致。150 个页面通过 · 25 个页面不适用
中文用词:简体中文页面会检查中国大陆、台湾和香港的用词差异。25 个页面通过
读者:任何人都可以在任何部分、以任何语言报告错误。—

我们使用哪些 AI 模型

报告错误

位置:我们使用哪些 AI 模型

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

每个页面都由 Anthropic 的 AI 模型撰写和核查。此表根据每个已发布页面所附的记录统计。

步骤模型页数
bloc_summaryClaude Opus (Anthropic)175
impactClaude Opus (Anthropic)175
撰写初稿Claude Opus (Anthropic)175
研究为什么现在会出现在选票上Claude Opus (Anthropic)49
核查引用来源Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)175
中立性核查Claude Opus (Anthropic)175
浅白语言核查Claude Haiku (Anthropic)175
翻译Claude Opus (Anthropic)150
翻译Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)150
第二份独立翻译Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)150
比较两份翻译Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)150
回译Claude Haiku (Anthropic)150

本次选举没有进行由其他公司模型执行的交叉核查,因此上表显示为略过。

我们如何保持中立

报告错误

位置:我们如何保持中立

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

我们从不背书。我们以支持者的说法呈现双方最有力的论点。赞成和反对所用的颜色不带政党或好坏含义,我们页面上的两个椭圆形都一直留空。

我们如何在联盟光谱上定位提案

报告错误

位置:我们如何在联盟光谱上定位提案

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

联盟光谱由进步派联盟延伸至温和派联盟。提案的位置只取决于我们追踪的哪些团体背书或反对,以及双方各由谁出资,并采用下方列出的团体分类。这不是我们对提案的意见。

州提案的量尺一端是加州民主党及其盟友,另一端是加州共和党及其盟友,例如 Howard Jarvis 纳税人协会。位置的判定方法相同:只看哪些被追踪的团体为各方背书或出资。

资金数字的来源

报告错误

位置:资金数字的来源

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

旧金山的竞选资金数据来自旧金山道德委员会在DataSF上的申报资料,每天更新。州提案的资金数据来自加州州务卿(Cal-Access)。每个资金数字都会显示我们纳入的最新申报日期。

我们如何计算费用例子

报告错误

位置:我们如何计算费用例子

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

提案页面上的费用例子(例如业主每年的税单)由程序(ai/impact_costs.py)根据各页所引用的税率和金额计算。这些数字并非由人工智能模型撰写或估算。每个例子都列明其假设,例如建筑面积和评估价值,因此您自己的税单会有所不同。

我们如何翻译

报告错误

位置:我们如何翻译

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

页面翻译成中文(繁体和简体)、西班牙文、菲律宾文、越南文和俄文。用语会与选举局的词汇表核对,第三个模型会将译文翻译回英文以发现意思上的改变;凡旧金山或州政府发布选票问题的官方译本,我们都会显示该原文。俄文没有官方译本,因此俄文页面必须达到最严格的一致性标准。

为何每一页都标示由人工智能生成

报告错误

位置:为何每一页都标示由人工智能生成

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

这些页面由人工智能模型撰写和核查。我们在每一页都加上标示,让您随时知道,并显示每一页最后一次核查的时间。

更正及错误报告

报告错误

位置:更正及错误报告

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

每个部分都有「报告错误」按钮。每项更正都会连同日期和更改内容列在公开的更正记录中。

我们追踪的团体及其分类方式

报告错误

位置:我们追踪的团体及其分类方式

请告诉我们哪里不正确,如果可以,也请告诉我们正确资料在哪里。

只在您希望收到回复时填写。我们不会分享。

请附上错误的截图,或直接贴上。

团体类型分类原因
San Francisco Democratic Partyparty政党sf axis +0.40 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.81 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
San Francisco Republican Partyparty政党sf axis +0.60 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
GrowSFadvocacy温和派名单Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis +0.56 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis +0.04 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
TogetherSF Action (now Blueprint SF)advocacy温和派名单Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis +1.00 (computed from 6 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
San Francisco Chamber of Commercebusiness温和派名单Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis +0.79 (computed from 7 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis +1.00 (computed from 5 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Abundant SFadvocacy温和派名单Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
San Francisco League of Pissed Off Votersadvocacy进步派名单Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis -0.85 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.86 (computed from 11 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Clubdemocratic-club进步派名单Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis -0.85 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.96 (computed from 12 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Democratic Socialists of America, San Franciscoadvocacy进步派名单Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
San Francisco Berniecratsadvocacy进步派名单Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
San Francisco Labor Councillabor劳工sf axis -0.78 (computed from 3 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
SPURgood-government其他团体sf axis +0.65 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -1.00 (computed from 10 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
League of Women Voters of San Franciscogood-government其他团体sf axis -0.85 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
YIMBY Actionadvocacy其他团体sf axis +0.78 (computed from 6 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -1.00 (computed from 3 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
San Francisco Chronicle editorial boardnewspaper其他团体No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
San Francisco Women's Political Committeeadvocacy其他团体sf axis -0.60 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.89 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Alice B. Toklas LGBTQ Democratic Clubdemocratic-club其他团体sf axis +0.40 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.89 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Edwin M. Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Clubdemocratic-club其他团体sf axis +0.77 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.12 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
San Francisco Green Partyparty政党sf axis -0.83 (computed from 7 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.27 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
SEIU Local 1021labor劳工sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
San Francisco Taxpayers Associationtaxpayer其他团体sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
Sierra Club, San Francisco Bay Chapterenvironmental其他团体sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
San Francisco Tenants Uniontenant-advocacy其他团体sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
United Educators of San Franciscolabor劳工sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
Coalition on Homelessnessadvocacy其他团体sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
Small Business Forwardbusiness商界sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
California Democratic Partyparty政党Anchor for the state scale's left end (the two major parties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.); state axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
California Republican Partyparty政党Anchor for the state scale's right end (the two major parties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.); state axis +0.82 (computed from 11 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Associationtaxpayer其他团体Anchor for the state scale's right end (the two major parties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.); state axis +1.00 (computed from 10 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
California Labor Federationlabor劳工state axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
California Chamber of Commercebusiness商界No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
ACLU of Northern Californiacivil-rights其他团体state axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
League of Women Voters of Californiagood-government其他团体state axis -0.71 (computed from 12 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
California Teachers Associationlabor劳工state axis -0.60 (computed from 5 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)