您的一票代表什么
如果不获通过
不获通过则一切维持不变
如果提案F未获通过，市府现行规定维持不变。市长不能调动《市宪章》所设部门的职责，而大部分这类部门不能设有副市长。部门的理事会或委员会通常可以免任其主管。 3
为何现在出现在选票上
资金
市主计官说，提案F对政府开支的影响将很小，具体程度目前无法确定。市主计官估计每名副市长平均每年的费用约为25万美元。合并的费用或节省取决于计划。举例来说，市主计官引述2022-23年度的一次合并，估计在第一年节省了350万美元。 4
由谁承担费用
谁在背后
如何列入选票: 市民联署
选民签署联署书，将提案F列入选票。它需要53,076个有效签名，相当于其连署通知公布时登记选民的10%。选务处于2026年7月23日确认了联署书。 5
支持来自哪里
根据背书者和出资者来定位，而非根据我们的意见。 我们如何定位提案
提案F获得温和派联盟团体GrowSF、TogetherSF Action（现称Blueprint SF）和San Francisco Chamber of Commerce，以及SPUR和YIMBY Action的支持。反对提案F的有进步派联盟团体San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters和Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club，以及League of Women Voters of San Francisco和San Francisco Women's Political Committee。旧金山民主党和旧金山共和党都建议投赞成票。Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee的最大捐款者是Michael Moritz和Christian Larsen；没有任何反对提案F的委员会申报过捐款。 13911101214
背书
追踪资金
赞成主要捐款者
- Michael MoritzUS$309.3万
这是谁？
- Christian LarsenUS$148.8万
这是谁？
- Chris Larsen - Wikipedia
- SF-based crypto firm gave $5M to Trump’s controversial ballroom project | The San Francisco Standard
- Surprise, Lurie’s charter reform campaign is raking it in | The San Francisco Standard
- Lurie’s $13.5M campaign to clean up City Hall adds Newsom to its corner | The San Francisco Standard
- Official ballot question, Proposition F (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100
- Lyna LamUS$100万
这是谁？
- John PritzkerUS$100万
- Emerson Collective LLC(Diedra Nelson)US$55万
这是谁？
- L. John Doerr IIIUS$50万
- John WolthuisUS$50万
- Dagmar DolbyUS$50万
这是谁？
- Patrick CollisonUS$50万
- Michael SeibelUS$45万
这是谁？
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的52%。
- 22%来自旧金山以外。
- 2%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$2.8万
委员会: Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee)
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee): includes $300,000 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $27,590, mostly by: GrowSF Voter Guide $21,768; SPUR - San Francisco Bay Area Planning & Urban Research Association $5,823. These are separate from, and not included in, total_raised.
- Mayor Lurie's Yes on D, E & F Committee (Clean Up City Hall, Mayor Lurie's Ballot Measure Committee) is a multi-measure committee (also: Yes on D, Yes on E). Its filings don't divide money by measure, so its full total and donors are shown on every measure it covers; do not add the measures' totals together.
- No opposing committee has filed campaign statements for this measure as of this refresh.
- Totals are contributions reported on Form 460 (Schedule A monetary, C non-monetary, loans) plus Form 497 late reports, from Jan 2025 or the committee's 2026 start; amended filings replace the original. Unitemized gifts under $100 are in totals but not in donor lists or geography shares. Outside-SF/CA shares use itemized gifts only.
- Source cutoff: the SF Ethics Commission data on DataSF was loaded 2026-10-27 and includes filings received through 2026-10-26. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Committees from the June 2, 2026 election (Props A–D on business taxes, term limits and the earthquake bond) are not counted. See pipeline/config/money_committees.yaml for each exclusion.
资料来源: SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w) · SF Ethics Commission campaign finance summary totals (DataSF 9ggq-m8hp) · SF Ethics Commission campaign filers (DataSF 4c8t-ngau)
相关及互相竞争的提案
支持与反对的最有力论点
双方各自最有力的论点，按其支持者的说法撰写。两者都不代表我们的观点。
支持的最有力论点
支持者包括罗伟市长（Daniel Lurie）、市议会主席Rafael Mandelman和前市主计官Ben Rosenfield。他们说，各部门现在各自为政，而不是作为一个协调的政府运作。他们说，这个制度保护内部人士。他们说，过去十年有六名部门主管因贪腐被起诉或调查。他们说，当谋取私利的行为曝光，或部门主管无法胜任工作时，市长目前只能聘任和免任少数部门主管。他们认为，让市长聘任和免任其中大部分人，能建立清晰的问责关系。他们说，组织更完善的部门将带来更快的许可证审批和更干净的街道。他们说，市议会的多数可以否决任何重组。他们也说，道德委员会和警察监督机构将保持独立。 6
资料来源
本页每项事实都连结至以下其中一个来源。
- Official ballot question, Proposition F (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100
- Vote threshold for Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100
- Ballot Simplification Council digest of Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 100-101
- Controller's Statement on Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 101
- How Proposition F got on the ballot (Dept. of Elections), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 101
- Proponent's and opponent's arguments and rebuttals on Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 102-103
- Legal text of Proposition F, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 201-220
- Legal text of Proposition A, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 148-181
- SPUR: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of San Francisco: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- YIMBY Action: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- San Francisco Women's Political Committee: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop F: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-23 (compiled by this guide from SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w); data/money/sf-2026-11-f.json, main@0dcbec8)