跳至主要內容

由人工智能生成並經自動核查我們如何核查

報告錯誤

位置:本頁

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

運作方式

三藩市及加州 Ballot Backstory以七種語言說明每項提案的歷史、資金和支持者。以下說明這些頁面如何製作和核查。

我們發布甚麼

報告錯誤

位置:我們發布甚麼

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

每項提案一頁:投贊成票和反對票的作用、提案為何現在出現在選票上、涉及的資金、由誰列入選票、誰背書、雙方各由誰出資,以及支持和反對的最有力論點。其中七項提案還附有過去決策的時間線,以及過往提案承諾與成果的紀錄。

每一頁如何撰寫

報告錯誤

位置:每一頁如何撰寫

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

我們從原始資料出發:官方選民指南、主計長和立法分析師的財務分析、法律條文、競選財務申報以及已發布的背書。人工智能模型只根據這些資料起草每一頁,每一句都附有支持該句的來源連結。

自動核查

報告錯誤

位置:自動核查

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

頁面上線前沒有任何人審閱或編輯。每個頁面都必須通過以下自動核查。最後一欄顯示有多少已發佈頁面通過了每項核查。

核查結果
引用:由第二個模型確認每段引文都支持其所屬的句子。175 個頁面通過
數字:由程式將每個數字與來源數據比對。175 個頁面通過
引文:由程式確認每段引文都逐字出現在已保存的來源中。175 個頁面通過
交叉核查:由另一家公司的人工智能模型重新核查各項陳述。175 個頁面略過
中立性:由模型以進步派、溫和派和保守派讀者的角度閱讀,按中立準則為每份草稿評分。改寫後仍不合格的頁面只顯示官方文本。175 個頁面通過
淺白語言:由模型檢查每個頁面是否容易閱讀。175 個頁面通過
翻譯:由兩個模型各自翻譯,兩者意思不一致的部分會重新翻譯。—
回譯:由另一個模型把譯文翻回英文,以找出意思上的改變。150 個頁面通過 · 25 個頁面不適用
詞彙表:選舉用語必須與三藩市和加州的官方翻譯一致。150 個頁面通過 · 25 個頁面不適用
中文用詞:簡體中文頁面會檢查中國大陸、台灣和香港的用詞差異。25 個頁面通過
讀者:任何人都可以在任何部分、以任何語言報告錯誤。—

我們使用哪些 AI 模型

報告錯誤

位置:我們使用哪些 AI 模型

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

每個頁面都由 Anthropic 的 AI 模型撰寫和核查。此表根據每個已發佈頁面所附的紀錄統計。

步驟模型頁數
bloc_summaryClaude Opus (Anthropic)175
impactClaude Opus (Anthropic)175
撰寫初稿Claude Opus (Anthropic)175
研究為甚麼現在會出現在選票上Claude Opus (Anthropic)49
核查引用來源Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)175
中立性核查Claude Opus (Anthropic)175
淺白語言核查Claude Haiku (Anthropic)175
翻譯Claude Opus (Anthropic)150
翻譯Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)150
第二份獨立翻譯Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)150
比較兩份翻譯Claude Sonnet (Anthropic)150
回譯Claude Haiku (Anthropic)150

本次選舉沒有進行由其他公司模型執行的交叉核查,因此上表顯示為略過。

我們如何保持中立

報告錯誤

位置:我們如何保持中立

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

我們從不背書。我們以支持者的說法呈現雙方最有力的論點。贊成和反對所用的顏色不帶政黨或好壞含義,我們頁面上的兩個橢圓形都一直留空。

我們如何在聯盟光譜上定位提案

報告錯誤

位置:我們如何在聯盟光譜上定位提案

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

聯盟光譜由進步派聯盟延伸至溫和派聯盟。提案的位置只取決於我們追蹤的哪些團體背書或反對,以及雙方各由誰出資,並採用下方列出的團體分類。這不是我們對提案的意見。

州提案的量尺一端是加州民主黨及其盟友,另一端是加州共和黨及其盟友,例如 Howard Jarvis 納稅人協會。位置的判定方法相同:只看哪些被追蹤的團體為各方背書或出資。

資金數字的來源

報告錯誤

位置:資金數字的來源

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

三藩市的競選資金數據來自三藩市道德委員會在DataSF上的申報資料,每天更新。州提案的資金數據來自加州州務卿(Cal-Access)。每個資金數字都會顯示我們納入的最新申報日期。

我們如何計算費用例子

報告錯誤

位置:我們如何計算費用例子

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

提案頁面上的費用例子(例如業主每年的稅單)由程式(ai/impact_costs.py)根據各頁所引用的稅率和金額計算。這些數字並非由人工智能模型撰寫或估算。每個例子都列明其假設,例如建築面積和評估價值,因此您自己的稅單會有所不同。

我們如何翻譯

報告錯誤

位置:我們如何翻譯

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

頁面翻譯成中文(繁體和簡體)、西班牙文、菲律賓文、越南文和俄文。用語會與選務處的詞彙表核對,第三個模型會將譯文翻譯回英文以發現意思上的改變;凡三藩市或州政府發布選票問題的官方譯本,我們都會顯示該原文。俄文沒有官方譯本,因此俄文頁面必須達到最嚴格的一致性標準。

為何每一頁都標示由人工智能生成

報告錯誤

位置:為何每一頁都標示由人工智能生成

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

這些頁面由人工智能模型撰寫和核查。我們在每一頁都加上標示,讓您隨時知道,並顯示每一頁最後一次核查的時間。

更正及錯誤報告

報告錯誤

位置:更正及錯誤報告

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

每個部分都有「報告錯誤」按鈕。每項更正都會連同日期和更改內容列在公開的更正紀錄中。

我們追蹤的團體及其分類方式

報告錯誤

位置:我們追蹤的團體及其分類方式

請告訴我們哪裡不正確,如果可以,也請告訴我們正確資料在哪裡。

只在您希望收到回覆時填寫。我們不會分享。

請附上錯誤的截圖,或直接貼上。

團體類型分類原因
San Francisco Democratic Partyparty政黨sf axis +0.40 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.81 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
San Francisco Republican Partyparty政黨sf axis +0.60 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
GrowSFadvocacy溫和派名單Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis +0.56 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis +0.04 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
TogetherSF Action (now Blueprint SF)advocacy溫和派名單Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis +1.00 (computed from 6 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
San Francisco Chamber of Commercebusiness溫和派名單Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis +0.79 (computed from 7 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis +1.00 (computed from 5 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Abundant SFadvocacy溫和派名單Anchor for the sf scale's moderate end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
San Francisco League of Pissed Off Votersadvocacy進步派名單Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis -0.85 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.86 (computed from 11 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Clubdemocratic-club進步派名單Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis -0.85 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.96 (computed from 12 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Democratic Socialists of America, San Franciscoadvocacy進步派名單Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
San Francisco Berniecratsadvocacy進步派名單Anchor for the sf scale's progressive end, as listed in PLAN.md §5; No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
San Francisco Labor Councillabor勞工sf axis -0.78 (computed from 3 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
SPURgood-government其他團體sf axis +0.65 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -1.00 (computed from 10 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
League of Women Voters of San Franciscogood-government其他團體sf axis -0.85 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors)
YIMBY Actionadvocacy其他團體sf axis +0.78 (computed from 6 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -1.00 (computed from 3 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
San Francisco Chronicle editorial boardnewspaper其他團體No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
San Francisco Women's Political Committeeadvocacy其他團體sf axis -0.60 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.89 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Alice B. Toklas LGBTQ Democratic Clubdemocratic-club其他團體sf axis +0.40 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.89 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Edwin M. Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Clubdemocratic-club其他團體sf axis +0.77 (computed from 8 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.12 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
San Francisco Green Partyparty政黨sf axis -0.83 (computed from 7 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the moderate anchors, -1 = always with the progressive anchors); state axis -0.27 (computed from 13 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
SEIU Local 1021labor勞工sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
San Francisco Taxpayers Associationtaxpayer其他團體sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
Sierra Club, San Francisco Bay Chapterenvironmental其他團體sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
San Francisco Tenants Uniontenant-advocacy其他團體sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
United Educators of San Franciscolabor勞工sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
Coalition on Homelessnessadvocacy其他團體sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
Small Business Forwardbusiness商界sf axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
California Democratic Partyparty政黨Anchor for the state scale's left end (the two major parties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.); state axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
California Republican Partyparty政黨Anchor for the state scale's right end (the two major parties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.); state axis +0.82 (computed from 11 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Associationtaxpayer其他團體Anchor for the state scale's right end (the two major parties and the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.); state axis +1.00 (computed from 10 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
California Labor Federationlabor勞工state axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
California Chamber of Commercebusiness商界No Nov 2026 positions could be read; the org has no effect on any score.
ACLU of Northern Californiacivil-rights其他團體state axis not scored: fewer than 3 measures with a yes/no position where the anchors split
League of Women Voters of Californiagood-government其他團體state axis -0.71 (computed from 12 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)
California Teachers Associationlabor勞工state axis -0.60 (computed from 5 measures where the anchors split; +1 = always with the right anchors, -1 = always with the left anchors)