您的一票代表甚麼
投贊成票表示
親自投票的選民必須出示政府身分證明。若要郵寄投票，選民必須選定一種身分證明；只有信封上顯示其最後四位數字，選票才會被計算。 2
投反對票表示
選民繼續以簽名確認身分。親自投票的選民通常在選民名單上簽名，郵寄投票的選民則在選票信封上簽名。 3
兩個橢圓形都刻意留空。由您自己決定。
禁止公民在未出示政府簽發身份證明的情況下投票。倡議憲法修正案。 如果信封上未寫出指定政府簽發身份證明號碼的最後四位，則郵寄選票作廢。禁止在未出示政府簽發的身份證明的情況下，親自到場投票。財政影響：要實施新的投票要求，每年的成本在數千萬美元到數億美元之間。支持者： The Transparency Foundation; Latino American Political Assn; Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn; CA Women’s Leadership Assn 反對者：ACLU California Action; Common Cause; League of Women Voters of California
這是官方選民指南中的原文。
如果不獲通過
不獲通過則一切維持不變
如果第39號提案未通過，投票規則維持不變。立法分析師（LAO）說，親自投票的選民通常在名單上簽名。官員一般不核對這些簽名，但會核對郵寄選票信封上的簽名。 3
為何現在出現在選票上
資金
由誰承擔費用
誰在背後
支持來自哪裡
根據背書者和出資者來定位，而非根據我們的意見。 我們如何定位提案
加州共和黨和Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association建議對第39號提案投贊成票，加州民主黨則建議投反對票。民權團體ACLU of Northern California、勞工組織California Teachers Association和League of Women Voters of California也反對此提案。支持第39號提案的委員會的最大捐款者是Richard Uihlein和Joseph Gebbia。反對此提案的委員會的最大捐款者是加州民主黨和The Tribal Council of the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria。 786911101213
背書
追蹤資金
贊成主要捐款者
- Richard UihleinUS$1700萬
這是誰？
- Joseph GebbiaUS$800萬
這是誰？
- Reform California with Carl De Maio - Ballot Measure CommitteeUS$316.1萬
這是誰？
- Nicole ShanahanUS$37萬
這是誰？
- Perfect One CapitalUS$30萬
- Cameron WinklevossUS$25萬
這是誰？
- Tyler WinklevossUS$25萬
這是誰？
- Stark Industrial LLCUS$25萬
- Douglas LeoneUS$25萬
這是誰？
- Aubrey ChernickUS$15萬
這是誰？
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的79%。
- 81%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$188萬
委員會: Californians for Voter ID, Yes on 39
反對主要捐款者
- California Democratic PartyUS$613.5萬
- The Tribal Council of the Federated Indians of Graton RancheriaUS$197.5萬
- M. Quinn DelaneyUS$149.1萬
這是誰？
Quinn Delaney 是房地產投資人，也是慈善家。 1
- Patty QuillinUS$149.1萬
這是誰？
- California Nurses Association Initiative PACUS$108.5萬
- SEIU California State Council for Working PeopleUS$105.8萬
- California Teachers Association/
Issues PACUS$98.7萬 這是誰？
California Teachers Association的Issues PAC。該協會是總部設於加州伯靈蓋姆的教師工會，擁有超過30萬名會員。 1
- Dignity CA Service Employees International Union SEIU Local 2015US$98.7萬
- Reed HastingsUS$98.7萬
這是誰？
- Committee to Engage and Empower California VotersUS$79.2萬
這是誰？
一個加州委員會。該委員會表示，它成立於2020年，目的是讓新選民登記，並給他們投票所需的工具。 1
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的39%。
- 6%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$20.4萬
委員會: Black Californians for Thriving Communities-Yes on Prop 3, No on Props 39 & 43, Sponsored by California Black Power Network Action Fund; Californians for Yes on 3 and No on 39, Sponsored by California Immigrants in Action; Citizens for a Just California - No on 39, Sponsored by Higher Wages Lower Rent Alliance; Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund; No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic Organziations; No on Prop 39 - Californians for Voting Rights, Sponsored by California Donor Table & ACLU of Northern California; No on Prop 39 - VoteRiders Committee; United Against Prop. 39 - - Stop the Rig Sponsored by Nonprofit Labor and Civil Rights Organizations; Working Families for a Better Central Coast- Yes on Prop 3, No on Prop 39, Sponsored by Unidos 805 Action Fund; Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO
- Californians for Voter ID, Yes on 39: added $73,500 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $1,879,893, mostly by: Reform California with Carl DeMaio - Ballot Measure Committee $1,611,559; REPUBLICAN PARTY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY $105,488; Assembly Member David Tangipa for California - Ballot Measure Committee $72,744. Separate from total_raised.
- Citizens for a Just California - No on 39, Sponsored by Higher Wages Lower Rent Alliance (FPPC 1497488) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $50,000 of its $100,000 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (50%).
- Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund (FPPC 1496598) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $1,164,062 of its $2,412,491 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (48%).
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic Organziations (FPPC 1493991) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $19,820,078 of its $20,074,382 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (99%).
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic Organziations: added $996,177 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- No on Prop 39 - Californians for Voting Rights, Sponsored by California Donor Table & ACLU of Northern California (FPPC 1489007) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $4,809,410 of its $4,839,060 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (99%).
- No on Prop 39 - Californians for Voting Rights, Sponsored by California Donor Table & ACLU of Northern California: added $9,747 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- United Against Prop. 39 - - Stop the Rig Sponsored by Nonprofit Labor and Civil Rights Organizations (FPPC 1495206) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $7,051,189 of its $12,995,661 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (54%).
- NO side: $3,748,350 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $203,887, mostly by: Faith Votes, Sponsored by PICO California Action Fund $88,183; Committee to Save Our Neighborhoods, Sponsored by Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action $56,500; CALIFORNIA FOR ALL OF US - MCKINNOR BALLOT MEASURE COMMITTEE $14,850. Separate from total_raised.
- Committee totals are the Secretary of State's per-measure 'Total Reported Contributions' through 2026-10-22 (secretary of state page), plus later 24-hour reports from the Cal-Access bulk export built 2026-10-28. Donors, geography and independent expenditures come from the itemized Cal-Access filings. Contributions to committees that back several measures are credited pro rata to the share the Secretary of State assigns to this measure.
- Source cutoff: the Cal-Access export used was built 2026-10-27 (UTC) and the Secretary of State's per-measure totals run through 2026-10-22. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Money given to a committee by another committee is shown as that committee, not the money's original source (e.g. a union's issues PAC, not its members). Donor type is inferred from the name; check the filing for sponsors.
資料來源: CA Secretary of State: Proposition 39 contribution totals · Cal-Access raw campaign finance data export · FPPC Top 10 Contributors, November 2026 General Election
支持與反對的最有力論點
雙方各自最有力的論點，按其支持者的說法撰寫。兩者都不代表我們的觀點。
支持的最有力論點
支持者包括Transparency Foundation、拉丁美洲裔美國人政治協會（Latino American Political Association）、Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association和加州婦女領袖協會（California Women's Leadership Association）。他們說，選民身分證明將建立對選舉的信任，並得到民主黨、獨立和共和黨選民的支持。他們說，郵寄選票會保留，任何選民都可以獲得免費身分證。他們認為，目前的簽名核對很慢，可能導致選票不被計算。他們說，在上次選舉中，有超過10萬張選票因簽名不符而被拒絕。支持者說，第39號提案提高選民名單的準確性，並要求進行獨立審計；LAO說，它可能意味著登記選民減少，例如透過移除不合資格的選民，或移除沒有政府身分證明的合資格選民。他們也說，實行選民身分證明的州並未出現投票率下降。 143
反對的最有力論點
反對者包括ACLU California Action、Common Cause、League of Women Voters of California和美國參議員Alex Padilla。他們說，信封上一個數字寫錯就可能使有效選票作廢。郵寄投票的選民必須選定一種身分證明；反對者說，否則他們可能根本收不到郵寄選票。他們說，「免費」身分證需要付出交通、請假和文書工作的代價；長者、學生、低收入工作者、有色人種選民和婚後改名的女性受影響最大。他們說，官員已經在核實選民；LAO說，郵寄選票的簽名會被核對，但親自投票的一般不會。反對者說，在這類規定下，德州作廢的郵寄選票是加州的12倍；它每年可能花費數億美元，而且信封上的身分證號碼有身分盜竊的風險。他們將它與特朗普（Trump）的選舉說法聯繫起來。 143
資料來源
本頁每項事實都連結至以下其中一個來源。
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 39 (en edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3, 8
- Proposition 39: Official Title and Summary (prepared by the Attorney General), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1
- Proposition 39: Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-4
- Proposition 39: Arguments and rebuttals, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 5-6
- Proposition 39: Text of Proposed Law, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-2
- California Democratic Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Republican Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- ACLU of Northern California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Teachers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop 39: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-26 (compiled by this guide from CA Secretary of State: Proposition 39 contribution totals; data/money/ca-2026-11-p39.json, main@0dcbec8)
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 39 (zh-Hant edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026