您的一票代表什么
如果不获通过
不获通过则一切维持不变
如果提案G未获通过，公园维持现状。日落沙丘公园（即原来的上大公路）继续在所有时间禁止私人车辆通行。紧急车辆、政府车辆和公园接驳车仍可使用。 3
为何现在出现在选票上
资金
如果这条道路开放给私人车辆通行，市主计官估计一次性费用约为980万美元，包括在8个路口设置红绿灯的880万美元，以及拆除公园设施和恢复路面的约75万美元。每年费用可能增加50万至190万美元，包括清除沙子和重塑沙丘的约10万至150万美元。市主计官也预计公园工作日所需工作人员会减少，维护工作也会减少。这会降低费用，并让工作人员腾出时间做其他工作。作为参考，公园目前的工作人员费用约为每年30万美元。海岸许可证和Sloat重新设计可能会增加费用。 4
由谁承担费用
谁在背后
如何列入选票: 市民联署
选民签署了联署书。它需要10,615个有效签名，相当于登记选民的2%，而选务处认定的有效签名超过这个数目。 5
支持来自哪里
根据背书者和出资者来定位，而非根据我们的意见。 我们如何定位提案
旧金山共和党建议对提案G投赞成票，旧金山民主党则建议投反对票。温和派联盟团体GrowSF反对此提案，SPUR、YIMBY Action和San Francisco Bay Chapter of the Sierra Club也反对。San Francisco Chamber of Commerce保持中立；TogetherSF Action（现称Blueprint SF）、San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters和Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club列出了此提案，但没有表明任何立场。支持提案G的委员会的最大捐款者是Chinese American Democratic Club和Wei Selena Chu；反对此提案的委员会的最大捐款者是Jeremy Stoppelman和Laura Yakovenko。 13910111214
背书
追踪资金
赞成主要捐款者
- Chinese American Democratic ClubUS$2.5万
- Wei Selena ChuUS$9,900
- Lisa ArjesUS$5,000
- Sandra DratlerUS$5,000
- William OKeeffe Jr.US$4,990
- Better Housing PoliciesUS$3,800
- Peter WendellUS$3,500
- Tomasita MedalUS$3,500
- California Professional Firefighters PACUS$2,500
- California Nurses Association Political Action CommitteeUS$2,500
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的33%。
- 9%来自旧金山以外。
- 0%来自加州以外。
委员会: Yes on G, Great Highway for Everyone
反对主要捐款者
- Jeremy StoppelmanUS$40万
这是谁？
- Laura YakovenkoUS$20万
- Nicholas JosefowitzUS$5万
- Friends Of Sunset DunesUS$4.3万
- Donald J EdwardsUS$3.5万
- Fund For A Better Future Inc.US$2.5万
- Andrew CasteelUS$1.6万
- Stephen DodsonUS$1万
- Michael R GlaserUS$2,500
- Steven ChapmanUS$2,000
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的89%。
- 32%来自旧金山以外。
- 5%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$1.7万
委员会: No on G, Save Sunset Dunes sponsored by Friends of Sunset Dunes
- Yes on G, Great Highway for Everyone: includes $600 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- No on G, Save Sunset Dunes sponsored by Friends of Sunset Dunes: includes $1,000 of 24-hour late contributions (Form 497) dated after its latest Form 460 period ended 2026-10-17.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $16,706, mostly by: GrowSF Voter Guide $10,884; SPUR - San Francisco Bay Area Planning & Urban Research Association $5,823. These are separate from, and not included in, total_raised.
- Totals are contributions reported on Form 460 (Schedule A monetary, C non-monetary, loans) plus Form 497 late reports, from Jan 2025 or the committee's 2026 start; amended filings replace the original. Unitemized gifts under $100 are in totals but not in donor lists or geography shares. Outside-SF/CA shares use itemized gifts only.
- Source cutoff: the SF Ethics Commission data on DataSF was loaded 2026-10-27 and includes filings received through 2026-10-26. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Committees from the June 2, 2026 election (Props A–D on business taxes, term limits and the earthquake bond) are not counted. See pipeline/config/money_committees.yaml for each exclusion.
资料来源: SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w) · SF Ethics Commission campaign finance summary totals (DataSF 9ggq-m8hp) · SF Ethics Commission campaign filers (DataSF 4c8t-ngau)
支持与反对的最有力论点
双方各自最有力的论点，按其支持者的说法撰写。两者都不代表我们的观点。
资料来源
本页每项事实都连结至以下其中一个来源。
- Official ballot question, Proposition G (en edition), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108
- Vote threshold for Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108
- Ballot Simplification Council digest of Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108
- Controller's Statement on Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 108-109
- How Proposition G got on the ballot (Dept. of Elections), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 109
- Proponent's and opponent's arguments and rebuttals on Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 110-111
- Paid arguments on Proposition G (not checked for accuracy by any official body), SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 112-123
- Legal text of Proposition G, SF Voter Information Pamphlet, Nov 3, 2026, p. 220-222
- TogetherSF Action (now Blueprint SF): recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- SPUR: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- YIMBY Action: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- KQED Voter Guide: Prop G (supporters and opponents listed)
- How endorsers line up on Prop G: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-22 (compiled by this guide from SF Ethics Commission campaign finance transactions (DataSF pitq-e56w); data/money/sf-2026-11-g.json, main@0dcbec8)