加州
第3号提案通过延长现行针对高收入群体的税收向学校与医疗保健提供永久资金。倡议宪法修正案。
您的一票代表什么
如果不获通过
为何现在出现在选票上
资金
由谁承担费用
谁在背后
如何列入选票: 市民联署
它以公民倡议案的形式列入选票，而不是经由州议会。作为一项宪法修正案，它会修改州宪法本身。 5
支持来自哪里
根据背书者和出资者来定位，而非根据我们的意见。 我们如何定位提案
加州民主党建议对第3号提案投赞成票，加州共和党和纳税人团体Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association则建议投反对票。劳工组织California Teachers Association和倡导良好施政的团体League of Women Voters of California也支持此提案。支持第3号提案的委员会的最大捐款者是California Teachers Association / Issues PAC和National Education Association (MPO)。反对此提案的委员会的最大捐款者是Family Business Association of California Issues Political Action Committee和Pacific Coast Companies, Inc.。 6781091112
背书
追踪资金
赞成主要捐款者
一名捐款者捐出此方一半以上的资金。
- California Teachers Association /
Issues PACUS$5997.4万 - National Education Association (MPO)US$746.2万
这是谁？
一个教育工作者团体。其网站说，它有300万名会员，在每个州及超过14,000个社区设有附属组织。 1
- California Federation of Teachers COPE Prop/
Ballot CommitteeUS$184.1万 这是谁？
捐款者的说法
CFT表示，其会员投票支持第3号提案。CFT会长Jeff Freitas表示：“我们要么给加州最富有的人减税，要么继续为公立学校和其他所需服务提供资金。” 1
- PACE of California School Employees Association IssuesUS$159.2万
这是谁？
PACE of CSEA – Issues是California School Employees Association作为主要出资者的三个委员会之一。该工会代表非教师的学校职员，例如校车司机和校工。 1
利害关系
根据公开记录，并非捐款者本身的解释。
- SEIU California State Council for Working PeopleUS$150.1万
- Service Employees International Union - SEIU Local 2015 Issues PACUS$99.5万
- California School Employees AssociationUS$99.5万
- California Democratic PartyUS$83.4万
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic OrganizationsUS$79.9万
这是谁？
名为“No on 39”的委员会。其名称表示，它由护士、教师，以及非营利劳工和诊所团体赞助。 1
- United Domestic Workers of America Issues PACUS$75.1万
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的89%。
- 11%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$13.2万
委员会: Black Californians for Thriving Communities-Yes on Prop 3, No on Props 39 & 43, Sponsored by California Black Power Network Action Fund; Californians for Yes on 3 and No on 39, Sponsored by California Immigrants in Action; Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund; Tax the Ultra-Rich Now, Yes on 3 & 40, No on 41 & 42; Working Families for a Better Central Coast- Yes on Prop 3, No on Prop 39, Sponsored by Unidos 805 Action Fund; Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO; Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor Organizations
反对主要捐款者
一名捐款者捐出此方一半以上的资金。
- Family Business Association of California Issues Political Action CommitteeUS$5,000
- Pacific Coast Companies, Inc.US$500
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方资金的100%。
- 0%来自加州以外。
- 独立开支（不受竞选活动控制）：US$6.1万
委员会: No on Proposition 3, Sponsored by California Taxpayers Association
- Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund (FPPC 1496598) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $1,690,062 of its $2,412,491 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (70%).
- Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO (FPPC 1497629) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $0 of its $100,000 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (0%).
- Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor Organizations (FPPC 1483562) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $78,298,756 of its $78,702,751 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (99%).
- Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor Organizations: added $325,000 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- YES side: $506,095 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $131,777, mostly by: Committee to Save Our Neighborhoods, Sponsored by Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action $56,500; KIWA ACTION $11,500; ACLU California Action Issues Committee $8,989. Separate from total_raised.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $60,693, mostly by: Reform California with Carl DeMaio - Ballot Measure Committee $53,500; Campaign for Children and Families $5,089; REPUBLICAN PARTY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY $2,104. Separate from total_raised.
- Committee totals are the Secretary of State's per-measure 'Total Reported Contributions' through 2026-10-22 (secretary of state page), plus later 24-hour reports from the Cal-Access bulk export built 2026-10-28. Donors, geography and independent expenditures come from the itemized Cal-Access filings. Contributions to committees that back several measures are credited pro rata to the share the Secretary of State assigns to this measure.
- Source cutoff: the Cal-Access export used was built 2026-10-27 (UTC) and the Secretary of State's per-measure totals run through 2026-10-22. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Money given to a committee by another committee is shown as that committee, not the money's original source (e.g. a union's issues PAC, not its members). Donor type is inferred from the name; check the filing for sponsors.
资料来源: CA Secretary of State: Proposition 3 contribution totals · Cal-Access raw campaign finance data export · FPPC Top 10 Contributors, November 2026 General Election
支持与反对的最有力论点
双方各自最有力的论点，按其支持者的说法撰写。两者都不代表我们的观点。
支持的最有力论点
支持者包括加州教师协会（California Teachers Association）、California School Nurses Organization和Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California。他们说，第3号提案“不会提高你的税”。他们说，它维持前2%的人过去15年一直缴纳的税率。他们说，让这些税率结束会给最富有的人大幅减税。他们说，其他人则会面临教师裁员、教室拥挤，以及Medi-Cal（州政府为低收入人士提供的医疗计划）被削减。他们说，这笔钱直接拨给本地学校和社区学院。他们补充说，这笔钱不能用于行政开支，并且每年接受审计。他们说，通过资助学校，它能腾出州政府资金用于医疗保健和消防。 4
反对的最有力论点
反对者包括加州纳税人协会（California Taxpayers Association）、Family Business Association of California和California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce。他们说，选民当初被告知这些较高税率是暂时的，为期七年。他们说，之后这些税率又被延长了12年。他们说，让这些税率成为永久就是加税：“加州历史上最大规模的永久性州所得税增加”。他们说，它将使纳税人“每年付出高达150亿美元”。他们认为，加州的问题在于支出，而不是收入。他们说，1,000亿美元的盈余在三年内变成了300亿美元的赤字。他们说，高所得税增加了全国最高的生活成本。他们还说，浪费和超支不能成为“进一步提高我们的税”的借口。 4
资料来源
本页每项事实都连结至以下其中一个来源。
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 3 (en edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3, 6
- Proposition 3: Official Title and Summary (prepared by the Attorney General), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1
- Proposition 3: Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-2
- Proposition 3: Arguments and rebuttals, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3-4
- Proposition 3: Text of Proposed Law, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-7
- California Democratic Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Republican Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Teachers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop 3: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-26 (compiled by this guide from CA Secretary of State: Proposition 3 contribution totals; data/money/ca-2026-11-p3.json, main@0dcbec8)