加州
第3號提案通過延長現行針對高收入群體的稅收向學校與醫療保健提供永久資金。倡議憲法修正案。
您的一票代表甚麼
兩個橢圓形都刻意留空。由您自己決定。
通過延長現行針對高收入群體的稅收向學校與醫療保健提供永久資金。倡議憲法修正案。 將年收入超過 371,000 美元 (每年根據通貨膨脹率進行調整) 的個人現行、經選民批准的稅率永久化。將稅收收入分配給公共教育。財政影響：對高收入群體的臨時加稅將在 2031 年到期，通過將其改為永久稅率，保障每年 50 億到 150 億美元的州政府所得稅。支持者： California Teachers Association; CA School Nurses Organization; California State PTA; Planned Parenthood Affiliates of CA 反對者：California Taxpayers Association; Family Business Association of California; California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
這是官方選民指南中的原文。
如果不獲通過
為何現在出現在選票上
資金
由誰承擔費用
誰在背後
如何列入選票: 市民聯署
它以公民倡議案的形式列入選票，而不是經由州議會。作為一項憲法修正案，它會修改州憲法本身。 5
支持來自哪裡
根據背書者和出資者來定位，而非根據我們的意見。 我們如何定位提案
加州民主黨建議對第3號提案投贊成票，加州共和黨和納稅人團體Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association則建議投反對票。勞工組織California Teachers Association和倡導良好施政的團體League of Women Voters of California也支持此提案。支持第3號提案的委員會的最大捐款者是California Teachers Association / Issues PAC和National Education Association (MPO)。反對此提案的委員會的最大捐款者是Family Business Association of California Issues Political Action Committee和Pacific Coast Companies, Inc.。 6781091112
背書
追蹤資金
贊成主要捐款者
一名捐款者捐出此方一半以上的資金。
- California Teachers Association /
Issues PACUS$5997.4萬 - National Education Association (MPO)US$746.2萬
這是誰？
一個教育工作者團體。其網站說，它有300萬名會員，在每個州及超過14,000個社區設有附屬組織。 1
- California Federation of Teachers COPE Prop/
Ballot CommitteeUS$184.1萬 這是誰？
捐款者的說法
CFT表示，其會員投票支持第3號提案。CFT會長Jeff Freitas表示：「我們要麼給加州最富有的人減稅，要麼繼續為公立學校和其他所需服務提供資金。」 1
- PACE of California School Employees Association IssuesUS$159.2萬
這是誰？
PACE of CSEA – Issues是California School Employees Association作為主要出資者的三個委員會之一。該工會代表非教師的學校職員，例如校車司機和工友。 1
利害關係
根據公開紀錄，並非捐款者本身的解釋。
- SEIU California State Council for Working PeopleUS$150.1萬
- Service Employees International Union - SEIU Local 2015 Issues PACUS$99.5萬
- California School Employees AssociationUS$99.5萬
- California Democratic PartyUS$83.4萬
- No on 39 - Block Election Rigging Sponsored by Nurses, Teachers, and Nonprofit Labor and Community Health Clinic OrganizationsUS$79.9萬
這是誰？
名為「No on 39」的委員會。其名稱表示，它由護士、教師，以及非營利勞工和診所團體贊助。 1
- United Domestic Workers of America Issues PACUS$75.1萬
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的89%。
- 11%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$13.2萬
委員會: Black Californians for Thriving Communities-Yes on Prop 3, No on Props 39 & 43, Sponsored by California Black Power Network Action Fund; Californians for Yes on 3 and No on 39, Sponsored by California Immigrants in Action; Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund; Tax the Ultra-Rich Now, Yes on 3 & 40, No on 41 & 42; Working Families for a Better Central Coast- Yes on Prop 3, No on Prop 39, Sponsored by Unidos 805 Action Fund; Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO; Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor Organizations
反對主要捐款者
一名捐款者捐出此方一半以上的資金。
- Family Business Association of California Issues Political Action CommitteeUS$5,000
- Pacific Coast Companies, Inc.US$500
- 前5大捐款者捐出此方資金的100%。
- 0%來自加州以外。
- 獨立開支（不受競選活動控制）：US$6.1萬
委員會: No on Proposition 3, Sponsored by California Taxpayers Association
- Communities for an Affordable California, Yes on 3, No on 39 and 43 Sponsored by Million Voters Project Action Fund (FPPC 1496598) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $1,690,062 of its $2,412,491 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (70%).
- Working People in Supporting of Prop 3 and in Opposition of Prop 39, 43 and 45, Sponsored by Los Angeles County Federation of Labor AFL-CIO (FPPC 1497629) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $0 of its $100,000 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (0%).
- Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor Organizations (FPPC 1483562) supports or opposes several measures; the Secretary of State attributes $78,298,756 of its $78,702,751 to this one. Donor amounts here are scaled by that same share (99%).
- Yes on Prop 3, Sponsored by Education and Labor Organizations: added $325,000 of 24-hour late contributions dated after the Secretary of State's 2026-10-22 cutoff.
- YES side: $506,095 given by one committee on this side to another was counted once.
- YES side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $131,777, mostly by: Committee to Save Our Neighborhoods, Sponsored by Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action $56,500; KIWA ACTION $11,500; ACLU California Action Issues Committee $8,989. Separate from total_raised.
- NO side independent expenditures (Form 496) of $60,693, mostly by: Reform California with Carl DeMaio - Ballot Measure Committee $53,500; Campaign for Children and Families $5,089; REPUBLICAN PARTY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY $2,104. Separate from total_raised.
- Committee totals are the Secretary of State's per-measure 'Total Reported Contributions' through 2026-10-22 (secretary of state page), plus later 24-hour reports from the Cal-Access bulk export built 2026-10-28. Donors, geography and independent expenditures come from the itemized Cal-Access filings. Contributions to committees that back several measures are credited pro rata to the share the Secretary of State assigns to this measure.
- Source cutoff: the Cal-Access export used was built 2026-10-27 (UTC) and the Secretary of State's per-measure totals run through 2026-10-22. as_of is the latest filing from this measure's own committees, which can be earlier.
- Money given to a committee by another committee is shown as that committee, not the money's original source (e.g. a union's issues PAC, not its members). Donor type is inferred from the name; check the filing for sponsors.
資料來源: CA Secretary of State: Proposition 3 contribution totals · Cal-Access raw campaign finance data export · FPPC Top 10 Contributors, November 2026 General Election
支持與反對的最有力論點
雙方各自最有力的論點，按其支持者的說法撰寫。兩者都不代表我們的觀點。
支持的最有力論點
支持者包括加州教師協會（California Teachers Association）、California School Nurses Organization和Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California。他們說，第3號提案「不會提高你的稅」。他們說，它維持前2%的人過去15年一直繳納的稅率。他們說，讓這些稅率結束會給最富有的人大幅減稅。他們說，其他人則會面臨教師裁員、課室擠迫，以及Medi-Cal（州政府為低收入人士提供的醫療計劃）被削減。他們說，這筆錢直接撥給本地學校和社區學院。他們補充說，這筆錢不能用於行政開支，並且每年接受審計。他們說，透過資助學校，它能騰出州政府資金用於醫療保健和消防。 4
反對的最有力論點
反對者包括加州納稅人協會（California Taxpayers Association）、Family Business Association of California和California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce。他們說，選民當初被告知這些較高稅率是暫時的，為期七年。他們說，之後這些稅率又被延長了12年。他們說，讓這些稅率成為永久就是加稅：「加州歷史上最大規模的永久性州所得稅增加」。他們說，它將使納稅人「每年付出高達150億美元」。他們認為，加州的問題在於支出，而不是收入。他們說，1,000億美元的盈餘在三年內變成了300億美元的赤字。他們說，高所得稅增加了全國最高的生活成本。他們還說，浪費和超支不能成為「進一步提高我們的稅」的藉口。 4
資料來源
本頁每項事實都連結至以下其中一個來源。
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 3 (en edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3, 6
- Proposition 3: Official Title and Summary (prepared by the Attorney General), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1
- Proposition 3: Analysis by the Legislative Analyst, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-2
- Proposition 3: Arguments and rebuttals, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 3-4
- Proposition 3: Text of Proposed Law, CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026, p. 1-7
- California Democratic Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Republican Party: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- League of Women Voters of California: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- California Teachers Association: recommendations for the November 3, 2026 election
- How endorsers line up on Prop 3: this guide's coalition groupings (endorsement method 1.0, data as of 2026-10-27)
- Campaign finance filings as of 2026-10-26 (compiled by this guide from CA Secretary of State: Proposition 3 contribution totals; data/money/ca-2026-11-p3.json, main@0dcbec8)
- Ballot label: title (table of contents) and summary (Quick Reference Guide), Proposition 3 (zh-Hant edition), CA Official Voter Information Guide, Nov 3, 2026